24 User(s) are reading this topic (in the past 30 minutes)
0 members, 24 guests
0 members, 24 guests
What's popular right now:








1.6 reward campaing (100 users)

AoKTS updates (68 users)

Word Association (51 users)

CBA PathBlood 1.8.2 (43 users)

New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (30 users)

what does the file age2_x1.xml d... (26 users)

Creating an Allied Vision LN (25 users)
Most active threads in past week:








Unable to see messages in game r... (5 posts)

Problem with chat in GAME (4 posts)

XQ NO ME PUEDO UNIR A NINGUNA SALA (2 posts)

Unable to spec 1.6 game data games (2 posts)

problem with spec mode (2 posts)

Impossible to play - voobly keep... (1 posts)

Please do smth about people leav... (1 posts)
What exactly is your problem with a vote?
If you wan't a tournament where you dictate every rule, then i suggest you go host one. A vote is the only fair way to do it here.
dont answer anymore pls bcoz i wont
making live vetos forces everyone to be ready for every situation with really not thinking time, which forces you to be ready before the match set up starts (as i said before)
They also have a limited roster unlike our case, they cannot entirely switch out their players for every other match.
Honestly, the only real reason for you insisting on this can be, that you try to get an advantage by picking weird and unusual civcombinations and not allowing the opponent time to create a gameplan. And you talk about making it competitive... Trying to get cheap wins?
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
Oh and i understand the 1hr rule, clans with 100+ members needs time to manage the players and decide who plays what, play few practice game and watch some records if there is time left, fine.
That is how RB plans to knock out xCs into the Silver League.